Back

5 Failed Outsourcing Examples to Learn From

In the ever-evolving landscape of business, the concept of outsourcing has become synonymous with efficiency, cost-effectiveness, competitive advantage, and improved productivity. We’ve explored the many advantages of outsourcing, from streamlining production processes to substantial cost savings.

Indeed, this strategic allocation of tasks to external experts can empower companies to focus on their core competencies and achieve great growth.

However, as the saying goes, “With great power comes great responsibility.” While outsourcing can be an incredible ally in a company’s quest for success, it also carries the potential for significant problems. The same sword that can cut through inefficiency and reduce costs, can, if mishandled, cut deep into a company’s reputation and performance.

In this article, we will go on a journey through real-life examples of outsourcing gone wrong. These stories emphasize the need for careful and prudent outsourcing. While outsourcing offers many advantages by delegating tasks to external experts through contracts, it requires diligence.

It’s crucial to avoid the costly mistakes made by some businesses. So, let’s examine these cautionary tales, learn from them, and discover how to navigate outsourcing wisely.

Outsourcing Failure Case #1: The Boeing 787 Dreamliner (2011)

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner case is a compelling example of the consequences of extensive outsourcing in the aerospace industry, which can also teach some lessons to companies looking to outsource in any other industry. 

The Dreamliner plane was designed to revolutionize air travel through its lightweight construction and fuel efficiency. However, it encountered a myriad of challenges and setbacks during its development process and production, primarily stemming from Boeing’s ambitious outsourcing strategy.

How Was Outsourcing Involved?

Boeing’s approach to outsourcing for the Dreamliner was unprecedented in scale, with over 70% of the aircraft’s components being manufactured by a global network of suppliers. While outsourcing is a common practice in the aerospace sector, Boeing’s decision to rely heavily on external suppliers led to a cascade of issues.

Communication and coordination challenges became apparent as Dreamliner’s supply chain stretched around the world, resulting in significant production delays and quality control problems. The outsourcing strategy introduced complexities in design, quality assurance, and production, ultimately leading to design flaws, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and extensive delays.

What Outsourcing Lesson Can We Learn from This?

The Dreamliner case teaches companies considering outsourcing some important lessons. It highlights how vital it is to balance saving money with making sure the quality stays high. To avoid the problems Boeing faces, companies need to communicate well with their suppliers and keep a close eye on what they’re doing.

It’s also important to build strong relationships with suppliers, check the quality of their work carefully, and keep some essential skills and tasks in-house. This case shows that while outsourcing can save money and bring benefits, it can also be risky. So, it’s crucial to fully understand the potential problems and be committed to managing them carefully when taking on complex projects.

Outsourcing Failure Case #2: Target’s Data Breach (2013)

In 2013, Target, one of the largest retailers in the United States, fell victim to a massive data breach that compromised the personal and financial information of 40 million customers. The breach, which occurred during the busy holiday shopping season, was a major cybersecurity incident that sent shockwaves through the retail industry.

How Was Outsourcing Involved?

Outsourcing played a significant role in the Target data breach. The attackers gained access to Target’s network through a third-party vendor, an HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) contractor, who had access to the retailer’s systems for maintenance purposes. Unfortunately, this vendor’s credentials were used to infiltrate Target’s network, exposing sensitive customer data.

What Outsourcing Lesson Can We Learn from This?

The Target data breach serves as a strong reminder of the importance of risk management when outsourcing critical functions. Companies should meticulously assess and monitor the security practices of third-party companies with access to their systems.

It’s crucial to implement robust cybersecurity protocols not only internally but also across the entire supply chain. Regular security audits, contractual agreements that enforce data protection standards, and continuous monitoring are essential components of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy.

Ultimately, the breach highlights the necessity for companies to prioritize the security of customer data, regardless of who is involved in their operations, and to understand that outsourcing can introduce significant risks that require vigilant management and oversight.

Outsourcing Failure Case #3: Electronic Data Systems’s (EDS) modernization of the US Navy’s systems

The lack of communication between the US Navy and Electronic Data Systems (EDS) in the late 1990s serves as a cautionary tale in the realm of outsourcing. EDS was contracted to modernize the Navy’s information systems, but the project encountered significant challenges due to a breakdown in communication and understanding between the two parties.

How Was Outsourcing Involved?

Outsourcing played a central role in this matter as the Navy had outsourced the responsibility of modernizing its information technology infrastructure to EDS.

While outsourcing can bring expertise and cost-efficiency, in this case, it led to a disconnect between the Navy’s needs and EDS’s understanding of those needs. The Navy relied heavily on EDS to manage the project, including the transfer of critical operational functions, which increased the misalignment.

What Outsourcing Lesson Can We Learn From This?

The Navy and EDS case highlights the vital importance of clear and consistent communication in outsourcing arrangements. Companies outsourcing critical functions must ensure that their objectives and expectations are explicitly communicated to the service provider.

It’s crucial to establish strong lines of communication, transparency, and a shared understanding of project risks and goals. Furthermore, outsourcing doesn’t absolve organizations of their responsibilities; they must remain actively involved in project management and oversight.

The lesson here is that an outsourcing project should not be seen as a hands-off approach but rather as a collaborative effort. The success of outsourcing partnerships depends on effective communication, a shared vision, and a commitment to regular engagement and feedback. Failing to uphold these principles in an outsourcing venture can lead to costly misunderstandings and project failures.

Outsourcing Failure Case #4: IBM’s Outsourcing of Indiana’s Welfare System (2006-2009)

This case is a striking example of how outsourcing can go awry. Indiana’s government hired IBM to modernize and manage the online systems for the state’s welfare eligibility system, a critical public service. However, the project faced extensive challenges and ultimately led to a terminated contract.

How Was Outsourcing Involved?

Outsourcing played a central role in this case since Indiana entrusted IBM with the responsibility of revamping the welfare system, including technology upgrades, data centers, call center operations, and customer service. IBM, in turn, subcontracted some of these tasks to other companies. This complex web of outsourcing introduced many more layers of complexity, making it challenging to pinpoint accountability when issues arose.

What Outsourcing Lesson Can We Learn from This?

The Indiana welfare system outsourcing debacle highlights the need for thorough due diligence in selecting outsourcing partners. Companies considering outsourcing must meticulously assess the capabilities and track record of their chosen service providers.

Additionally, maintaining an effective supervision mechanism is crucial to ensure that the outsourcing partner delivers on its promises.

A critical lesson here is the importance of effective communication and collaboration between all parties involved in the outsourcing arrangement. Misaligned expectations, inadequate supervision, poor communication, and a lack of transparency were major contributors to the Indiana case’s failure.

This emphasizes the need for clear contractual agreements, continuous monitoring of project developments, and a commitment to open communication channels.

Outsourcing Failure Case #5: Volkswagen’s Emissions Scandal (2015)

This scandal remains a notorious example of corporate misconduct. Volkswagen, one of the world’s largest vehicle companies, was discovered to have manipulated emissions data in millions of diesel vehicles to meet environmental regulations falsely. This deception tarnished the company’s reputation and resulted in substantial legal and financial consequences.

How Was Outsourcing Involved?

Outsourcing played a role in the Volkswagen scandal as the company had outsourced the development of its engine control software to external suppliers. These suppliers were responsible for designing software that could enable the vehicles to meet emissions standards during testing but emit higher levels of pollutants during regular driving conditions.

This outsourcing of critical software development allowed Volkswagen to distance itself from direct responsibility for the deception.

What Outsourcing Lesson Can We Learn from This?

The Volkswagen emissions scandal shows the importance of maintaining ethical oversight and responsibility in outsourcing partnerships. Companies should not delegate critical decision-making or compliance responsibilities to third-party suppliers in a way that allows them to deflect legal and ethical obligations.

The lesson here is that outsourcing should be guided by ethical and legal standards, with companies taking full accountability for the products and services they provide to consumers, even when those were provided by an outsourced partner or third party.

Transparency and responsible management of outsourcing relationships are essential to prevent damaging scandals like the Volkswagen case and protect both a company’s reputation and its customers.

Why Does Outsourcing Fail?

Outsourcing, when executed improperly, can lead to significant failures and setbacks for businesses. Drawing upon the lessons learned from the cases we just mentioned, it becomes evident that outsourcing can be a double-edged sword.

While it can offer cost savings and specialized expertise, several common mistakes can lead to outsourcing failures. Here are some reasons why outsourcing often fails:

1. Delegation of Core Activities

One of the more common mistakes is outsourcing core business activities that are essential to the company’s operations. When critical functions are delegated to third-party outsourcing companies or vendors, the company loses direct control and oversight over these processes.

This can result in a disconnect between the outsourcing provider and the company’s objectives, leading to inefficiencies, quality issues, and reduced customer satisfaction.

2. Loss of Handling

Careless hiring, such as engaging with unreliable suppliers or overextending by hiring more personnel than the company can effectively manage, can lead to a loss of control over critical processes. This lack of control can result in disarray within the company, leading to negative financial implications and operational disruptions.

3. Dependence on Suppliers

Depending on the nature of the outsourced service, businesses may become overly reliant on their outsourcing partners. This dependency can create challenges if the company needs to change or terminate its relationship with the supplier.

The business may find itself in a vulnerable position, relying on the supplier’s skills to complete essential tasks. Over time, third-party agents may become deeply integrated into the company’s operations, leading to a risky employment relationship.

These reasons highlight the importance of careful planning, risk assessment, and ongoing management in outsourcing endeavors. It’s crucial to strike a balance between cost reduction and maintaining control over core business activities to ensure outsourcing arrangements contribute positively to a company’s success rather than becoming a liability.

So, How Can We Avoid Outsourcing Failures?

Drawing from lessons learned from the previous outsourcing challenges, and the reasons for failure that we highlighted, here are key strategies that your company can take to prevent setbacks when it comes to outsourcing:

1. Delegate Carefully

Delegate only minor or non-core activities to outsourcing partners, while retaining critical core functions in-house. This approach ensures that the outsourced project work remains manageable and aligns with the company’s core business objectives.

2. Manage Staff Expansion Prudently:

Exercise caution when expanding staff through outsourcing. Avoid acquiring more personnel than the company can effectively manage or more than what is truly necessary. Overextending in this manner can lead to loss of control and inefficiencies.

3. Perform Thorough Supplier Background Checks

Thoroughly research and analyze the background of potential outsourcing suppliers. Verify their financial stability and assess their experience in working with companies or clients similar to your own. Seek evidence or testimonials from individuals familiar with their services to gain a better understanding of their reliability and performance.

4. Establish Clear Pricing and Performance Targets

Set clear and fair pricing arrangements in your outsourcing contracts. Ensure that the contract outlines payments with well-defined performance targets, providing a transparent understanding of what you are paying for and the expected outcomes.

5. Align Cultures and Values

Consider cultural compatibility when selecting an outsourcing partner. Visit the supplier’s offices or engage in remote discussions to assess whether your corporate cultures align. Open dialogue about your corporate culture and brand as an employer is vital to fostering a strong working relationship. A shared cultural understanding can contribute to a productive and long-lasting partnership.

6. Actively Manage the Relationship:

Invest in the ability to control and manage the outsourcing relationship. Expect your outsourcing partner to invest in the necessary skills and techniques to deliver quality service, but also develop your business’s capacity to manage the partnership effectively.

Active management and oversight are key to ensuring that the outsourcing arrangement meets your goals and objectives.

By following these strategies and exercising diligence in your outsourcing decisions, you can minimize the risks associated with outsourcing and create productive, mutually beneficial relationships with your outsourcing partners.

Outsource successfully with us!

All our clients who have hired our outsourcing services give incredible testimonials that you can check on our main page. We hope this information has been useful to you and that you already know that you can count on us to optimize your company’s efficiency through not only our outsourcing services but also through all the business management information we provide here in our blog and on our Social Media!

This website stores cookies on your computer. Cookie Policy